DOI: https://doi.org/10.18517/ijods.5.2.64-74.2024
Visualizing Type 2 Diabetes Prevalence: Localizing Model Feature Impacts
Abstract
SHAP values have been a common approach used to understand machine learning model predictions by averaging the marginal contributions of each feature across every possible permutation of the feature set. Our research provides a localized view of SHAP values contributing to Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) prevalence in the United States from 2012 - 2021 covering each year independently. Instead of visualizing SHAP feature importance across an entire geographical dataset using a beeswarm plot, our approach is more granular. We visualize individual SHAP values of Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) features by county on a Choropleth map. Additionally, we found that replacing geographic identifiers such as zipcode with precise latitude and longitude coordinates before applying KNN imputation reduced the MSE by 10%. Our visualization reveals how specific factors influence T2D prevalence at the county level using a non-linear machine learning model. By re-appending the initially preserved geographic identifiers for each record by index, we traced the contribution of each SHAP value back to its locality. Our approach opens up a new geographical vantage point of the mechanisms of model predictions, thereby identifying localized key factors influencing Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). This study extends the possibilities for tailored interventions and public health policies showing how some factors have varying predictive impact on an outcome at the geographic level.
Article Details
References
system, 2024.
[2] OpenStreetMap contributors. Openstreetmap, 2024. Open Database License.
[3] Ivan Dokmanic, Reza Parhizkar, Juri Ranieri, and Martin Vetterli. Euclidean
distance matrices: A short walk through theory, algorithms and applications.
CoRR, abs/1502.07541, 2015.
[4] Feeding America. Hunger and poverty in the united states — map the meal gap,
2024.
[5] Debra Haire-Joshu and Felicia Hill-Briggs. The next generation of diabetes translation: A path to health equity. Annual Review of Public Health, 40:391–410,
2019.
[6] Steven A Hicks, Inga Str¨umke, Vajira Thambawita, Malek Hammou, Michael A
Riegler, P˚al Halvorsen, and Sravanthi Parasa. On evaluation metrics for medical
applications of artificial intelligence. Scientific reports, 12(1):5979, 2022.
[7] Anil Jadhav, Dhanya Pramod, and Krishnan Ramanathan. Comparison of performance of data imputation methods for numeric dataset. Applied Artificial
Intelligence, 33(10):913–933, 2019.
[8] Ziqi Li. Extracting spatial effects from machine learning model using local interpretation method: An example of shap and xgboost. Computers, Environment
and Urban Systems, 96:101845, 2022.
[9] Fang Liu and Demosthenes Panagiotakos. Real-world data: a brief review of
the methods, applications, challenges and opportunities. BMC Medical Research
Methodology, 22, 11 2022.
[10] Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. A unified approach to interpreting model
predictions. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.