AI Adoption Patterns in Banking: A PCA-Based K-Means Clustering Analysis Using Evident AI Index Rankings
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
The study investigated the adoption of AI in the banking sector using a PCA-based k-means clustering method, drawing on data from the Evident AI Index Rankings. The objective was to identify distinct patterns in banks' integration and use of AI technologies, with an emphasis on talent, innovation, leadership, and transparency. Utilizing PCA for dimensionality reduction, the study distilled the intricate aspects of AI adoption into fundamental components, thereby improving the comprehension of clustering patterns among banks. The k-means clustering identified unique segments within the sector, such as early AI adopters, innovation leaders, and conservative implementers, each exhibiting distinct levels of AI maturity and application focus. These findings provided valuable insights into the competitive landscape of AI utilization in banking, highlighting leading institutions in AI-driven transformation and those encountering adoption challenges. The insights from this analysis offered practical implications for stakeholders, guiding strategies for improved AI integration and competitive positioning. The study emphasizes the significance of data-driven benchmarking tools, such as the Evident AI Index, in assessing and guiding technological evolution across the sector.
J. Bughin, J. Seong, J. Manyika, M. Chui, and R. Joshi, Notes from the AI Frontier: Modeling the Impact of AI on the World Economy. New York, NY, USA: McKinsey Global Institute, 2018.
E. Brynjolfsson and A. McAfee, Machine, Platform, Crowd: Harnessing Our Digital Future. New York, NY, USA: W.W. Norton & Company, 2017.
D. W. Arner, J. Barberis, and R. P. Buckley, “FinTech, RegTech, and the reconceptualization of financial regulation,” Northwestern J. Int. Law Business, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 371–414, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb/vol37/iss3/2.
Evident, The Evident AI Index Banks: The Global Standard Benchmark of AI Maturity. London, U.K.: Evident Insights, 2024.
I. T. Jolliffe and J. Cadima, “Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments,” Philosophical Trans. Roy. Soc. A, Math., Phys. Eng. Sci., vol. 374, no. 2065, p. 20150202, 2016, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0202.
S. Makridakis, “The forthcoming artificial intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms,” Futures, vol. 90, pp. 46–60, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006.
L. Zavolokina, M. Dolata, and G. Schwabe, “The FinTech phenomenon: Antecedents of financial innovation perceived by the popular press,” Financial Innov., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 16, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1186/s40854-016-0036-7.
A. Belelieu, D. Propson, and D. Parker, “Artificial intelligence in financial services,” World Econ. Forum, White Paper, 2025.
A. Kassambara, Practical Guide to Principal Component Methods in R: PCA, (M)CA, FAMD, MFA, HCPC, Factoextra (Multivariate Analysis), 1st ed. U.S.A.: STHDA, 2017.
A. Kassambara, Practical Guide to Cluster Analysis in R: Unsupervised Machine Learning (Multivariate Analysis), 1st ed. U.S.A.: STHDA, 2017.
A. K. Jain, “Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means,” Pattern Recognit. Lett., vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 651–666, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011.
J. MacQueen, “Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations,” in Proc. 5th Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Probab., Berkeley, CA, USA, 1967, vol. 1, pp. 281–297.
L. Kaufman and P. J. Rousseeuw, Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
R. Tibshirani, G. Walther, and T. Hastie, “Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic,” J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. B (Statist. Methodol.), vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 411–423, 2001, doi: 10.1111/1467-9868.00293.
M. Charrad, N. Ghazzali, V. Boiteau, and A. Niknafs, “NbClust: An R package for determining the relevant number of clusters in a data set,” J. Statist. Softw., vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 1–36, 2014, doi: 10.18637/jss.v061.i06.
A. Fuster, P. Goldsmith-Pinkham, T. Ramadorai, and A. Walther, “Predictably unequal? The effects of machine learning on credit markets,” J. Finance, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 5–47, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1111/jofi.13090.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/